Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
| GENEFLOR SACRO, Proposed Intervenor and MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor |
| BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation, SUMMERVILLE AT ATHERTON COURT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, BROOKDALE EMPLOYEE SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware corporation, BROOKDALE VEHICLE HOLDING, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING, INC., a Delaware corporation, BROOKDALE LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, BKD PERSONAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, BROOKDALE EMPLOYEE SERVICES CORPORATE, LLC, a Delaware corporation and EMERITUS CORPORATION, a Washington corporation |
| NINA REJUSO, Proposed Intervenor |
| CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated |
| 20-55752 |
| July 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: TAH) The appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). A copy of this order sent to the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [11807514] (OC) [Entered: 08/31/2020 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Nina Rejuso Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 08/20/2020. [11796688] [20-55752] (Larsen, Neil) [Entered: 08/20/2020 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact Circuit Mediator to discuss services available through the Circuit Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11777983] (VS) [Entered: 08/05/2020 10:08 AM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/31/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11773995]. [20-55752] (AD) [Entered: 07/31/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Nina Rejuso Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/31/2020. [11773957] [20-55752] (Larsen, Neil) [Entered: 07/31/2020 06:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the May 20, 2020 order challenged in the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A); United States v. Oakland, 958 F.2d 300, 301-02 (9th Cir. 1992) (dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction where appellant did not appeal from denial of intervention until after final judgment). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11771858] (OC) [Entered: 07/30/2020 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Nina Rejuso Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/31/2020. Appellant Nina Rejuso opening brief due 09/25/2020. Appellees BKD Personal Assistance Services, LLC, BKD Twenty-One Management Company, Inc., Brookdale Employee Services Corporate, LLC, Brookdale Employee Services, LLC, Brookdale Living Communities, Inc., Brookdale Senior Living Communities, Inc., Brookdale Senior Living, Inc., Brookdale Vehicle Holding, LLC, Carolyn D. Callahan, Does, Emeritus Corporation and Summerville at Atherton Court, LLC answering brief due 10/26/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11765120] (RT) [Entered: 07/24/2020 11:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
