Steven Brown v. Ami Mali, et al
| TERRI SMITH, Supervising Socal Worker, SCSWII, DCFS, individual, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN SERVICES and CITY OF LONG BEACH |
| AMI MALI, Social Worker, individual, EDUARDO SALDANO, Police Officer Long Beach City, LBPD, individual, LISA ARNOLD, Social Worker SCSWII (Supervisor) DCFS, individual and MARIA SOTELO RODRIGUEZ, Social Worker, individual |
| STEVEN DWAYNE BROWN |
| 20-55842 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, JBR and MBC) [11855939] (JFF) [Entered: 10/13/2020 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11831130] (OC) [Entered: 09/21/2020 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Steven Dwayne Brown opening brief due 10/09/2020. Appellees Lisa Arnold, Ami Mali, Eduardo Saldano and Maria Sotelo Rodriguez answering brief due 11/09/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11793675] (JBS) [Entered: 08/18/2020 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
