Hugh Nguyen, et al v. Tesla, Inc.
| E'RIKA BROCK, TODD WOLVEN, IAN ELLWOOD, individuals, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and HUGH NGUYEN |
| TESLA, INC., a Delaware corporation, DBA Tesla Motors, Inc. |
| 20-55873 |
| August 25, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Tesla, Inc. reply to response to order to show cause dated 08/31/2020. Date of service: 10/01/2020. [11843436] [20-55873] (Kizirian, Eric) [Entered: 10/01/2020 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Hugh Nguyen, Ian Ellwood, Todd Wolven and E'rika Brock response to order to show cause dated 08/31/2020. Date of service: 09/21/2020. [11831996] [20-55873] (Chen, Edward) [Entered: 09/21/2020 11:31 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also 9 U.S.C. 16; Dees v. Billy, 394 F.3d 1290, 1294 (9th Cir. 2005) (order compelling arbitration and staying judicial proceedings not immediately appealable); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11808029] (JMR) [Entered: 08/31/2020 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants E'rika Brock, Ian Ellwood, Hugh Nguyen and Todd Wolven Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/01/2020. Appellants E'rika Brock, Ian Ellwood, Hugh Nguyen and Todd Wolven opening brief due 10/26/2020. Appellee Tesla, Inc. answering brief due 11/27/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11801456] (RT) [Entered: 08/25/2020 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
