James Erwin v. Michael Ramos, et al
| COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO |
| HOLLIS BUD RANDLES, in his individual capacity, JAMES HACKLEMAN, in his individual capacity, ROBERT SCHREIBER, in his individual capacity and MICHAEL A. RAMOS, in his individual capacity |
| JAMES HOWARD ERWIN |
| 20-55903 |
| August 28, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellees James Hackleman, Michael A. Ramos, Hollis Bud Randles and Robert Schreiber reply to response to order to show cause dated 09/23/2020. Date of service: 10/15/2020. [11860775] [20-55903] (Slyngstad, Charles) [Entered: 10/15/2020 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed order MEDIATION (SL): A dial-in telephone conference will be held on November 10, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in information. The briefing schedules in these appeals are amended as follows: appellants' opening briefs are due January 4, 2021; appellees' answering briefs are due February 4, 2021; appellants' optional reply briefs are due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [11852787] [20-55896 , 20-55898, 20-55899, 20-55901, 20-55903, 20-55904, 20-55905] (AF) [Entered: 10/08/2020 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant James Howard Erwin response to Court order dated 10/05/2020. Date of service: 10/05/2020. [11847382] [20-55903] (Yockelson, Alan) [Entered: 10/05/2020 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged may not be final or appealable as to plaintiff-appellant. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); cf. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 525-30 (1985) (orders denying claims of immunity are generally immediately appealable). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11834852] (AF) [Entered: 09/23/2020 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (VLS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference with counsel and Circuit Mediator Stephen Liacouras at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Each attorney on the attached list of participants will receive an email with dial-in information. If there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Also, if counsel has an unavoidable scheduling conflict, please notify Circuit Mediator Stephen Liacouras immediately by email (stephen_liacouras@ca9.uscourts.gov) and copy all counsel on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case number in the subject line. All discussions that take place in the context of the assessment conference are confidential. See Circuit Rule 33-1. For more detailed information about the assessment conference, confidentiality, and the Mediation Program and its procedures generally, please see the attachment to this order and the Mediation Program web site: www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. The briefing schedules previously set by the court remain in effect. (Date: October 8, 2020 Time: 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time) (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [11818813] [20-55896, 20-55898, 20-55899, 20-55901, 20-55903, 20-55904, 20-55905] (AF) [Entered: 09/10/2020 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 Deleted Incorrect Entry. [11818776] [18-72995, 20-55898, 20-55899, 20-55901, 20-55903, 20-55904, 20-55905] (AF) [Entered: 09/10/2020 10:35 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/03/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11812390]. [20-55903] (AD) [Entered: 09/03/2020 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant James Howard Erwin Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/03/2020. [11812048] [20-55903] (Yockelson, Alan) [Entered: 09/03/2020 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Alan Steven Yockelson for party(s) Appellant James Howard Erwin, in case 20-55903. [11811773] (CW) [Entered: 09/03/2020 06:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Alan Steven Yockelson (Law Office of Alan S. Yockelson, 501 W. Broadway #A-385, San Diego, California 92101) for Appellant James Howard Erwin. Date of service: 09/03/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11811760] [20-55903] (Yockelson, Alan) [Entered: 09/03/2020 06:14 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant James Howard Erwin Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/04/2020. Transcript ordered by 09/25/2020. Transcript due 10/26/2020. Appellant James Howard Erwin opening brief due 12/04/2020. Appellees James Hackleman, Michael A. Ramos, Hollis Bud Randles and Robert Schreiber answering brief due 01/04/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11806653] (RT) [Entered: 08/28/2020 04:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
