Alan Douglas v. Superior Court of California,
| ALAN DOUGLAS |
| SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES |
| 20-55919 |
| September 3, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE): A review of the record and appellants response to this courts September 3, 2020 order to show cause demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk shall transmit appellants response to this courts order to show cause (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) to the district court for filing as a notice of appeal from the final judgment entered on August 24, 2020. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(d). All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11861547] (AF) [Entered: 10/16/2020 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Alan Douglas motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11826286] (RR) [Entered: 09/16/2020 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Alan Douglas response to order to show cause. [11826284] (RR) [Entered: 09/16/2020 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 09/14/2020. Denying IFP [11824909] (RR) [Entered: 09/15/2020 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal does not challenge any final or appealable orders of the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the district courts final judgment entered on August 24, 2020. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [11812543] (CKP) [Entered: 09/03/2020 02:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 08/21/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11812324] (JPD) [Entered: 09/03/2020 12:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Alan Douglas v. Superior Court of California, | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: ALAN DOUGLAS | |
| Represented By: | Alan Douglas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
