George Huffman v. Stanley Sniff, et al
| DOES 1-4, Riverside Jail, individual and official capacity, STANLEY L. SNIFF, Riverside County Sheriff, in individual and official capacity, BENJAMIN GRAVES, Correction Captain, individual and official capacity, CHERL EVANS, Correctional Chief, individual and official capacity, DOSHIER, Correctional Lieutenant, individual and official capacity, DOES, 5-8, Murieta Jail, RAUL VERGARA, Correctional Captain, individual and official capacity, EDWARD DELGADO, N3144, Correctional Captain, individual and official capacity, JEFFREY GREEN, N4681, correctional Deputy II and DOES, 9-12, Indio Jail |
| GEORGE DAVID HUFFMAN |
| 20-56010 |
| September 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Streamlined request by Appellant George David Huffman to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary upon the Courts disposition of the motion to appoint Pro Bono counsel. Dockert [10]. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11904264] (DLM) [Entered: 11/23/2020 05:07 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant George David Huffman motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/25/2020. [11879644] (CW) [Entered: 11/02/2020 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 9 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11866963] (CKP) [Entered: 10/21/2020 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 8 Sent: Appellant George David Huffman copy of court rules. [ # 7 ] [11865815] (ER) [Entered: 10/20/2020 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant George David Huffman letter dated 10/11/2020 re: request for copy of court rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11864785] (CW) [Entered: 10/20/2020 06:58 AM] |
| Filing 6 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 10/11/2020. [Case Number 20-56010: Partially Paid] [11864784] (CW) [Entered: 10/20/2020 06:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 Mail returned on 10/13/2020 addressed to George David Huffman, re: 09/30/2020 case opening information. Returned envelope notes: "metal detected, no metal allowed, return to sender." Resending to: same address (Indio Jail) with staple removed. [11856765] --[Edited: Updated Address. 10/13/2020 by TYL] (LA) [Entered: 10/13/2020 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Kelly A. Moran, substituted by attorney Susan Gail Knock Beck, in 20-56010. [11849773] (HH) [Entered: 10/06/2020 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of SUSAN GAIL KNOCK BECK (THOMPSON & COLEGATE LLP; 3610 14th Street; P.O. Box 1299; Riverside, CA 92502) for Appellees Edward Delgado, Cherl Evans, Benjamin Graves, Raul Vergara, Jeffrey Green and Appellant George David Huffman. Substitution for Attorney Kelly A. Moran for Appellees Edward Delgado, Cherl Evans, Benjamin Graves, Jeffrey Green and Raul Vergara. Date of service: 10/06/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11849755] [20-56010] (Beck, Susan) [Entered: 10/06/2020 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11843848] (CKP) [Entered: 10/01/2020 12:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant George David Huffman opening brief due 11/27/2020. Appellees Stanley L. Sniff, et al. answering brief due 12/28/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11842024] (JPD) [Entered: 09/30/2020 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
