Jeffrey Barke, et al v. Eric Banks, et al
| LAURA FERGUSON, PHILLIP YARBROUGH, JIM REARDON, RODGER DOHM, ED SACHS, LEIGHTON ANDERSON and JEFFREY I. BARKE |
| CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA LABOR FEDERATION, CALIFORNIA SCHOOL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, CALIFORNIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS and SEIU CALIFORNIA STATE COUNCIL |
| ERIC BANKS, ARTHUR A. KRANTZ, J. FELIX DE LA TORRE, in his official capacity as General Counsel of PERB, LOU PAULSON, in their official capacities as members of the California Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) and ERICH SHINERS |
| 20-56075 |
| October 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Michael Rosman for party(s) Appellant Laura Ferguson, Appellant Phillip Yarbrough, Appellant Rodger Dohm, Appellant Ed Sachs, Appellant Leighton Anderson, Appellant Jeffrey I. Barke and Appellant Jim Reardon, in case 20-56075. [11875712] (QDL) [Entered: 10/29/2020 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael Evan Rosman (Center for Individual Rights, 1100 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 625, Washington, DC 20036) for Appellants Leighton Anderson, Jeffrey I. Barke, Rodger Dohm, Laura Ferguson, Jim Reardon, Ed Sachs and Phillip Yarbrough. Date of service: 10/29/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11875658] [20-56075] (Rosman, Michael) [Entered: 10/29/2020 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact Circuit Mediator to discuss services available through the Circuit Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11872105] (LW) [Entered: 10/26/2020 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/23/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11869998]. [20-56075] (AD) [Entered: 10/23/2020 12:45 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jeffrey I. Barke, Ed Sachs, Laura Ferguson, Jim Reardon, Leighton Anderson, Phillip Yarbrough and Rodger Dohm Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/23/2020. [11869924] [20-56075] (Schwarz, David) [Entered: 10/23/2020 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Leighton Anderson, Jeffrey I. Barke, Rodger Dohm, Laura Ferguson, Jim Reardon, Ed Sachs and Phillip Yarbrough Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/23/2020. Transcript ordered by 11/16/2020. Transcript due 12/14/2020. Appellants Leighton Anderson, Jeffrey I. Barke, Rodger Dohm, Laura Ferguson, Jim Reardon, Ed Sachs and Phillip Yarbrough opening brief due 01/25/2021. Appellees Eric Banks, California Federation of Teachers, California Labor Federation, California School Employees Association, California Teachers Association, J. Felix De La Torre, Arthur A. Krantz, Lou Paulson, SEIU California State Council and Erich Shiners answering brief due 02/24/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11862299] (JBS) [Entered: 10/16/2020 03:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
