Shawn Fletcher v. Leroy Baca, et al
| R. LAVAN, Deputy Sheriff, DAVIN A. AGUSTINES, Dr., GHAIMEAN, Dr., Erroneously Sued As Shohreh Ghaemian, EDGARS, Deputy, Erroneously Sued As Anthony Eagar, STEVE FERNANDEZ, Deputy, DOES, 1-8, WILMORE, Dr., HENRY REYES, Lt. Watch Commander, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, P. F. ENRIQUEZ, Dr., DUNCAN, Sgt., J. AGUILAR, Deputy, LEROY D. BACA, Sheriff, R. CLINKINGBIRD, Deputy Sheriff, CAMPBELL, Dr., BROWN, Dr., S. KENNEDY, Deputy Sheriff, E. AGUIRRE, Deputy Sheriff and B. DELATORRE, Deputy Sheriff |
| SHAWN D. A. FLETCHER, AKA Shawn Allan Fletcher |
| 20-56098 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Streamlined request by Appellant Shawn D. A. Fletcher to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [11928042] (JN) [Entered: 12/15/2020 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Shawn D. A. Fletcher motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11927452] (NAC) [Entered: 12/15/2020 12:02 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Shawn D. A. Fletcher motion to take judicial notice ; includes statement that appeal should go forward. Deficiencies: None [11928559] (NAC) [Entered: 12/15/2020 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11888501] (CKP) [Entered: 11/10/2020 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 20-56098: Due] ). [11888258] (CO) [Entered: 11/10/2020 11:33 AM] |
Filing 3
Received copy of District Court order filed on 11/06/2020. REVOKING IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs IFP status is revoked as this Court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) and is frivolous [11886059] (NAC) [Entered: 11/09/2020 10:19 AM]
|
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11868502] (CKP) [Entered: 10/22/2020 12:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shawn D. A. Fletcher opening brief due 12/14/2020. Appellees J. Aguilar, E. Aguirre, Davin A. Agustines, Leroy D. Baca, Brown, Campbell, City of Los Angeles, R. Clinkingbird, County of Los Angeles, B. Delatorre, Does, Duncan, Edgars, P. F. Enriquez, Steve Fernandez, Ghaimean, S. Kennedy, R. Lavan, Henry Reyes and Wilmore answering brief due 01/13/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11865321] (JMR) [Entered: 10/20/2020 11:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
