Jeff Sikking, et al v. USHUD, et al

Jeff Sikking, et al v. USHUD, et al

Defendant / Appellee:	REGIS A. GUERIN, in his corporate and individual capacities, JPMORGAN CHASE CUSTODY SERVICES, INC., in its corporate capacity, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, in its corporate & municipal capacities, ARCOLA FREEMAN, in his or her individual and corporate capacities, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., in its corporate capacity, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation; in their corporate and municipal capacities, DOES, 1-20 inclusive, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, a federal agency in its official capacity, SAN DIEGO CITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, in its corporate & municipal capacities, RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD, in his official & individual capacity, MARA W. ELLIOTT, in her official and individual capacities, DORIS O. BRITTON, KEMA FREEMAN, in his or her individual and corporate capacities and ONU OMORDIA, in his or her official and individual capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:	BARBARA SIKKING, LEON-QIYAM POGUE and JEFF SIKKING
Case Number:	20-56108
Filed:	October 21, 2020
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
December 14, 2020	Filing 4 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and BRIDGET S. BADE): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable); see also Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order) . Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11927309] (AF) [Entered: 12/14/2020 05:53 PM]
October 29, 2020	Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 10/29/2020. [11875522] (HH) [Entered: 10/29/2020 10:50 AM]
October 26, 2020	Filing 2 Filed Appellants Leon-Qiyam Pogue, Barbara Sikking and Jeff Sikking letter dated 10/19/2020 re: copy of notice of appeal. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11872369] (CW) [Entered: 10/26/2020 05:52 PM]
October 21, 2020	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Leon-Qiyam Pogue, Barbara Sikking and Jeff Sikking opening brief due 12/18/2020. Appellees Doris O. Britton, City of San Diego, Does, Mara W. Elliott, Arcola Freeman, Kema Freeman, Richardson C. Griswold, Regis A. Guerin, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Custody Services, Inc., Onu Omordia, People of the State of California, San Diego City Planning & Development, Code Enforcement Division and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development answering brief due 01/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11866650] (JBS) [Entered: 10/21/2020 10:04 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jeff Sikking, et al v. USHUD, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: REGIS A. GUERIN, in his corporate and individual capacities
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE CUSTODY SERVICES, INC., in its corporate capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF SAN DIEGO, in its corporate & municipal capacities
Represented By:	Steven Ray Guess
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ARCOLA FREEMAN, in his or her individual and corporate capacities
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., in its corporate capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation; in their corporate and municipal capacities
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1-20 inclusive
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, a federal agency in its official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAN DIEGO CITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, in its corporate & municipal capacities
Represented By:	Steven Ray Guess
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD, in his official & individual capacity
Represented By:	Richardson C. Griswold
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARA W. ELLIOTT, in her official and individual capacities
Represented By:	Steven Ray Guess
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DORIS O. BRITTON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEMA FREEMAN, in his or her individual and corporate capacities
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ONU OMORDIA, in his or her official and individual capacities
Represented By:	Steven Ray Guess
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BARBARA SIKKING
Represented By:	Barbara Sikking
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LEON-QIYAM POGUE
Represented By:	Leon-Qiyam Pogue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JEFF SIKKING
Represented By:	Jeff Sikking
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?