Deion Lockhart v. John Doe, et al
| JOHN DOE, Corrections Officers, California Federal Prison, in individual and official capacities and JOHN DOE, Warden, California Federal Prison, in individual and official capacities |
| DEION DEE LOCKHART |
| 20-56112 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Deion Dee Lockhart motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 12/15/2020. Deficiencies: briefing is stayed, 42b mtn and ifp motion both pending. Served on 10/26/2020. [11881161] (CW) [Entered: 11/03/2020 05:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Deion Dee Lockhart motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: fee status not updated, 42b mtn pending. Served on 10/26/2020. [11881157] (CW) [Entered: 11/03/2020 04:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Deion Dee Lockhart motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/29/2020. [11881155] (CW) [Entered: 11/03/2020 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis because it found that the action was frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11871595] (CKP) [Entered: 10/26/2020 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Deion Dee Lockhart opening brief due 12/15/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11868117] (JPD) [Entered: 10/22/2020 09:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Deion Lockhart v. John Doe, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JOHN DOE, Corrections Officers, California Federal Prison, in individual and official capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JOHN DOE, Warden, California Federal Prison, in individual and official capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DEION DEE LOCKHART | |
| Represented By: | Deion Dee Lockhart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
