Tina Bradford v. LACOE, et al
| DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD, YORK RISK SERVICES, INC., LOS ANGELES COUNTY OFFICE OF EDUCATION, CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL and LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, (Healthcare Department) |
| TINA MARIE BRADFORD |
| 20-56148 |
| November 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Tina Marie Bradford opening brief of 3 pages (Informal: No). Served on 12/21/2020. [11945101] (LA) [Entered: 12/24/2020 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Tina Marie Bradford motion for relief of monetary judgement. Deficiencies: None. [11923313] (JFF) [Entered: 12/10/2020 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Tina Marie Bradford motion for government assistance. Deficiencies: None. [11908183] (JFF) [Entered: 11/27/2020 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tina Marie Bradford opening brief due 12/28/2020. Appellees Center for Disease Control, Department of Health Services, Los Angeles County Office of Education, Los Angeles Department of Health and Human Services, Workers Compensation Appeal Board and York Risk Services, Inc. answering brief due 01/27/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11878365] (JBS) [Entered: 11/02/2020 09:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
