Gerard Lawson v. Andrew Saul
| ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security |
| GERARD BARON LAWSON |
| 20-56205 |
| November 17, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellant Gerard Baron Lawson to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Gerard Baron Lawson opening brief due 02/16/2021. Appellee Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security answering brief due 03/18/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11957133] (DLM) [Entered: 01/08/2021 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Gerard Baron Lawson. New requested due date is 02/16/2021. [11957012] [20-56205] (Rohlfing, Lawrence) [Entered: 01/08/2021 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/30/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11910152]. [20-56205] (AD) [Entered: 11/30/2020 06:45 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Gerard Baron Lawson Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/30/2020. [11909489] [20-56205] (Rohlfing, Lawrence) [Entered: 11/30/2020 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the Ninth Cir. Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See FRAP 33 & Ninth Cir.R. 33-1. Mediation assessment conferences are not routinely scheduled in social security appeals. Csl are encouraged to contact circuit mediator if they believe this social security appeal has remand potential or is otherwise amenable to resolution. Specifically, csl are requested to contact the mediator if claimant has been awarded benefits after the district court's decision or if claimant is deceased. The mediator can also assist csl with procedural matters that may lead to the resolution of an appeal. Csl for the party contacting the Mediation Program are encouraged to copy csl for the other party to the appeal on any such requests. Info regarding the medation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11908803] (MS) [Entered: 11/30/2020 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Sharon Lahey in 20-56205 substituted by Attorney Daniel Paul Talbert in 20-56205 [11903465] (CW) [Entered: 11/23/2020 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel Talbert (SSA/OGC) for Appellee Andrew M. Saul. Substitution for Ms. Sharon Lahey for Appellee Andrew M. Saul and Ms. Chantal Jenkins, Esquire for Appellee Andrew M. Saul. Date of service: 11/23/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11903410] [20-56205] (Talbert, Daniel) [Entered: 11/23/2020 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gerard Baron Lawson Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/24/2020. Appellant Gerard Baron Lawson opening brief due 01/15/2021. Appellee Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security answering brief due 02/16/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11895232] (JBS) [Entered: 11/17/2020 08:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
