Gopher Media LLC, et al v. Phillip Spain, et al
| GOPHER MEDIA LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Corporation, DBA Doctor Multimedia, FKA Local Clicks |
| PHILLIP SPAIN, an individual and STEVEN MARINKOVICH, an individual |
| AJAY THAKORE |
| 20-56237 |
| November 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 01/25/2021, 2:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [11951184] (VS) [Entered: 01/04/2021 01:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees Steven Marinkovich and Phillip Spain response to order to show cause dated 12/22/2020. Date of service: 12/31/2020. [11949368] [20-56237] (Berger, Harvey) [Entered: 12/31/2020 08:28 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ajay Thakore response to Court order dated 12/11/2020. Date of service: 12/21/2020. [11935506] [20-56237] (Handal, Anton) [Entered: 12/21/2020 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal, which challenges the district courts November 18, 2020 order denying plaintiffs motion to set aside the magistrates discovery order and ordering plaintiff to produce certain of non-party appellant Thakores devices. See United States v. Ryan, 402 U.S. 530, 532-33 (1971) (non-party generally may not appeal a discovery order without first defying the order and being cited for contempt). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11924718] (WL) [Entered: 12/11/2020 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 12/16/2020, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11912757] (VS) [Entered: 12/02/2020 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/30/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11910156]. [20-56237] (AD) [Entered: 11/30/2020 06:45 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ajay Thakore Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/30/2020. [11909998] [20-56237] (Chalk, Pamela) [Entered: 11/30/2020 05:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ajay Thakore Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/30/2020. Appellant Ajay Thakore opening brief due 01/25/2021. Appellees Steven Marinkovich and Phillip Spain answering brief due 02/25/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11903651] (RT) [Entered: 11/23/2020 02:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
