Andre Citizen v. Brian Faylor, et al
| TY JAMES, No. F5107, individual and official capacity, LISA LOGAN, individual and offiicla capacity, VANESSA LOPEZ, No. C9280, individual and official capacity, MIRIAM I. MORTON, individual and officila capacity, ERIC M. NAKATA, individual and offiicla capacity, FELIX ARREOLA, No. 10225, individual and official capacity, JANICE RUTHERFORD, individual and official capacity, CURT HAGMAN, individual and offiical capacity, JOHN MCMAHON, individual and official capacity and BRIAN FAYLOR, No. C8640, individual and official capacity |
| ANDRE D. CITIZEN |
| 20-56244 |
| November 24, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, ADH and BSB) [11954208] (JFF) [Entered: 01/06/2021 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Andre D. Citizen EMERGENCY motion for appeal or preliminary injunction and vecate order. Deficiencies: None. Served on. [11934856] (JFF) [Entered: 12/21/2020 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, ANDREW D. HURWITZ and BRIDGET S. BADE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order); Silberkleit v. Kantrowitz, 713 F.2d 433, 434 (9th Cir. 1983) (order granting or denying a stay of proceedings is not generally a final decision appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11928143] (OC) [Entered: 12/15/2020 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [11905824] (RT) [Entered: 11/24/2020 04:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
