Tremayne Carroll v. Ralph Diaz, et al
| TREMAYNE CARROLL |
| COVELLO and RALPH DIAZ |
| 20-56308 |
| December 9, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 01/26/2021 ORDER denying certificate of appealability. [11981841] (RL) [Entered: 01/26/2021 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The district court has not issued or declined to issue a certificate of appealability in this appeal, which appears to arise under 28 U.S.C. 2254. This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability at the courts earliest convenience. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 (9th Cir. 1997). If the district court issues a certificate of appealability, the court should specify which issue or issues meet the required showing. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(3); Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. Under Asrar, if the district court declines to issue a certificate, the court should state its reasons why a certificate of appealability should not be granted, and the Clerk of the district court shall forward to this court the record with the order denying the certificate. See Asrar, 116 F.3d at 1270. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the district court. (Pro Se) [11932934] (CKP) [Entered: 12/18/2020 11:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11919922] (JMR) [Entered: 12/09/2020 10:13 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
