Tristram Buckley v. BMW of North America, et al
| BMW GALLERY, EUROPEAN AUTOMOTIVE GALLERY INC., BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, SOUTH SHORE BMW, SOKOL SOTA, DAVID SPIEGEL, Erroneously Sued As David Spiegal, DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive, jointly and severally, ED AMARAL, LUDWIG WILLISCH and ALAN ZAIDAN |
| TRISTRAM T. BUCKLEY |
| 20-56397 |
| December 28, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| TRISTRAM BUCKLEY V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12010793] (CKP) [Entered: 02/21/2021 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): On January 5, 2021, this court issued an order staying appellate proceedings pending disposition of the motion for relief from dismissal in the district court. On January 28, 2021, the district court denied the motion. The stay order filed January 5, 2021, is lifted and this appeal shall proceed. The briefing schedule established by the courts February 17, 2021 order remains in effect. [12010509] (RT) [Entered: 02/19/2021 05:30 PM] |
| Filing 5 Streamlined request [4] by Appellant Tristram T. Buckley to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Tristram T. Buckley opening brief due 03/29/2021. Appellees Ed Amaral, BMW Gallery, BMW of North America, Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, Does, European Automotive Gallery Inc., Sokol Sota, South Shore BMW, David Spiegel, Ludwig Willisch and Alan Zaidan answering brief due 04/28/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12006867] (DLM) [Entered: 02/17/2021 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Tristram T. Buckley. New requested due date is 03/26/2021. [12006282] [20-56397] (Buckley, Tristram) [Entered: 02/17/2021 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tristram T. Buckley response to Court order dated 01/05/2021. Date of service: 02/11/2021. [12000766] [20-56397] (Buckley, Tristram) [Entered: 02/11/2021 01:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely-filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The December 27, 2020 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending November 24, 2020 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11953012] (CKP) [Entered: 01/05/2021 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tristram T. Buckley opening brief due 02/25/2021. Appellees Ed Amaral, BMW Gallery, BMW of North America, Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft, Does, European Automotive Gallery Inc., Sokol Sota, South Shore BMW, David Spiegel, Ludwig Willisch and Alan Zaidan answering brief due 03/29/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11946175] (JMR) [Entered: 12/28/2020 01:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
