Jack Johnson v. D. Melo-Trejos, et al
| JACK ORLANDO JOHNSON |
| G. HEATER and D. MELO-TREJOS |
| 20-56419 |
| December 30, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case pursuant to rule 42b filed by Appellant Jack Orlando Johnson. This order shall constitute the mandate. [11986236] (CKP) [Entered: 01/29/2021 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Jack Orlando Johnson motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Deficiencies: None. [11984082] (RR) [Entered: 01/28/2021 07:35 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11959982] (CKP) [Entered: 01/12/2021 05:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jack Orlando Johnson opening brief due 02/19/2021. Appellees G. Heater and D. Melo-Trejos answering brief due 03/22/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11948488] (JMR) [Entered: 12/30/2020 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
