Rafael Pimentel-Estrada v. William Barr
RAFAEL PIMENTEL-ESTRADA |
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
20-70384 |
February 12, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
RAFAEL PIMENTEL-ESTRADA V. MERRICK GARLAND |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Shahrzad Baghai for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, in case 20-70384. [11596286] (NAC) [Entered: 02/13/2020 11:19 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Shahrzad Baghai (Department of Justice) for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 02/13/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11596278] [20-70384] (Baghai, Shahrzad) [Entered: 02/13/2020 11:16 AM] |
Filing 5 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11595715]. [20-70384] (CD) [Entered: 02/12/2020 05:40 PM] |
Filing 4 Motion to stay removal filed ( RE: [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing) , [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to stay removal/deportation (ECF)). Deficiency: None. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Response to motion for stay due 04/08/2020 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. The existing briefing schedule shall continue in effect. [11595641] (HH) [Entered: 02/12/2020 04:54 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Petitioner Rafael Pimentel-Estrada Motion to stay removal. Date of service: 02/12/2020. [11595623] [20-70384] (Ishola, Hakeem) [Entered: 02/12/2020 04:48 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Hakeem Ishola (Ishola Law Group, LLC, 1750 W. Research Way #204, West Valley City, Utah 84119) for Petitioner Rafael Pimentel-Estrada. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Hakeem Ishola, Esquire for Petitioner Rafael Pimentel-Estrada. Date of service: 02/12/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11595616] [20-70384] (Ishola, Hakeem) [Entered: 02/12/2020 04:45 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review. COUNSELED. Petitioner detained? YES. Certified Administrative Record due 03/18/2020. Petitioner opening brief due 05/18/2020 for Rafael Pimentel-Estrada. Respondent brief due 07/16/2020 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11595570] (JBS) [Entered: 02/12/2020 04:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Rafael Pimentel-Estrada v. William Barr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: RAFAEL PIMENTEL-ESTRADA | |
Represented By: | Hakeem Ishola Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Shahrzad Baghai |
Represented By: | OIL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.