Charles Fritsche v. Renee Baker
| CHARLES FRITSCHE |
| RENEE BAKER, Warden |
| 20-70574 |
| March 2, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed Petitioner Charles Fritsche motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11614635] (NAC) [Entered: 03/02/2020 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Charles Fritsche motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. (Transferred from No. 18-17197) [11614439] (HH) [Entered: 03/02/2020 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 Application for leave to file a second or successive petition filed. (Research) - Transferred from No. 18-17197. [11614427] (HH) [Entered: 03/02/2020 10:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Charles Fritsche v. Renee Baker | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: RENEE BAKER, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: CHARLES FRITSCHE | |
| Represented By: | Charles Fritsche |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
