Evelyn Carolina Campos Solano, et al v. William Barr
| FRANCISCO ENRIQUE LAINEZ, AKA Francisco Lainez Lainez Campos and EVELYN CAROLINA CAMPOS SOLANO |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 20-71229 |
| April 29, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Tim Ramnitz for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, in case 20-71229. [11676828] (RR) [Entered: 04/30/2020 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Tim Ramnitz (Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, PO Box 878 Ben Franklin Station, Washington DC 20044) for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 04/30/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11676686] [20-71229] (Ramnitz, Tim) [Entered: 04/30/2020 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. PRO SE. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 06/03/2020. Response to motion for stay due 06/24/2020 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 08/03/2020 for Evelyn Carolina Campos Solano and Francisco Enrique Lainez. Respondent brief due 10/01/2020 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11675696][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 04/30/2020 by BY] (JPD) [Entered: 04/29/2020 01:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
