Andrew Flores, et al v. USDC-CASD
ANDREW FLORES, an individual, JANE DOE, an individual and AMY SHERLOCK, on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor children, T.S. and S.S |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO |
LAWRENCE GERACI, an individual, AKA Larry, REBECCA BERRY, an individual, JAMES BARTELL, an individual, AKA Jim, ELYSSA KULAS, JESSICA CLAIRE MCELFRESH, an individual, LOGAN STELLMACHER, an individual, JOHN DOE, an individual, NINNUS MALAN, an individual, NATALIE TRANGMY NGUYEN, an individual, JAMES D. CROSBY, an individual, TAX & FINANCIAL CENTER, INC., a California Corporation, AARON MAGAGNA, an individual, 2018FMO, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, STEPHEN G. CLINE, an individual, RISHI S. BHATT, an individual, MATTHEW W. SHAPIRO, APC, a California Corporation, MICHAEL ROBERT WEINSTEIN, an individual, DAVID S. DEMIAN, an individual, JOEL R. WOHLFEIL, an individual, AMY SHERLOCK, MATTHEW WILLIAM SHAPIRO, an individual, JANE DOE, In re: ANDREW FLORES, BRADFORD HARCOURT, an individual, BIANCA MARTINEZ, an individual, RACHEL M. PRENDERGAST, an individual, EULENTHIAS DUANE ALEXANDER, an individual, SALAM RAZUKI, an individual, FERRIS & BRITTON APC, a California Corporation, A-M INDUSTRIES, INC., a California Corporation, GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual, ALAN CLAYBON, an individual, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipality, SHAWN MILLER, an individual, BARTELL & ASSOCIATES, a California Corporation, ABHAY SCHWEITZER, an individual, DBA Techne, SCOTT TOOTHACRE, an individual, AUSTIN LEGAL GROUP APC, a California Corporation, DOES, 2 through 50 inclusive, FIROUZEH TIRANDAZI, an individual, ADAM C. WITT, an individual and FINCH, THORTON, AND BAIRD, a Limited Liability Partnership |
20-71813 |
June 25, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed order (SUSAN P. GRABER, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and RYAN D. NELSON): Petitioners have not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of the court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977); see also Demos v. U.S. Dist. Court, 925 F.2d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir. 1991) ([T]his court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to a state court.). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners motion for injunctive relief (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied as moot. No further filings will be accepted in this closed case. DENIED. [11735550] (AF) [Entered: 06/26/2020 05:20 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Petitioners Jane Doe, Andrew Flores and Amy Sherlock EMERGENCY motion to enjoin Arron Magagna from selling or otherwise transferring the Conditional Use Permit issued at 6220 Federal Blvd., San Diego, California 92114. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/25/2020. [11733718] (JBS) [Entered: 06/25/2020 01:40 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. [11733706] (JBS) [Entered: 06/25/2020 01:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.