Erlinda Sanchez-Sanas, et al v. William Barr
Petitioner: EDWIN ALEXANDER BONILLA-SANCHEZ, JUAN FRANCISCO BONILLA-SANCHEZ and ERLINDA ARACELY SANCHEZ-SANAS
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Case Number: 20-72097
Filed: July 17, 2020
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2020 Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Carmel Aileen Morgan for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, in case 20-72097. [11764636] (NAC) [Entered: 07/24/2020 07:58 AM]
July 24, 2020 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Carmel Aileen Morgan (U.S. Dep't of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation, P.O. Box 878, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044) for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 07/24/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11764632] [20-72097] (Morgan, Carmel) [Entered: 07/24/2020 07:54 AM]
July 17, 2020 Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11757767]. [20-72097] (CD) [Entered: 07/17/2020 05:40 PM]
July 16, 2020 Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 08/20/2020. Response to motion for stay due 09/10/2020 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 10/19/2020 for Erlinda Aracely Sanchez-Sanas, et al. Respondent brief due 12/18/2020 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11756149] (BY) [Entered: 07/17/2020 07:35 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Erlinda Sanchez-Sanas, et al v. William Barr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: EDWIN ALEXANDER BONILLA-SANCHEZ
Represented By: Smirna Ayala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JUAN FRANCISCO BONILLA-SANCHEZ
Represented By: Smirna Ayala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ERLINDA ARACELY SANCHEZ-SANAS
Represented By: Smirna Ayala
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Carmel Aileen Morgan Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?