City of Sacramento v. FAA, et al
| CITY OF SACRAMENTO |
| STEPHEN M. DICKSON, in his official capacity as Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration and FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION |
| 20-72150 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/22/2020. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11762849]. [20-72150] (AD) [Entered: 07/22/2020 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Petitioner City of Sacramento Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/22/2020. [11761773] [20-72150] (Taber, Steven) [Entered: 07/22/2020 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR REVIEW. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED RESPONDENTS OF FILING. SEND MQ: Yes. Petitioner City of Sacramento Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/29/2020. Petitioner brief due 10/09/2020 for City of Sacramento. Respondent brief due 11/09/2020 for Stephen M. Dickson and Federal Aviation Administration. Petitioner's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11761637] (JMR) [Entered: 07/22/2020 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
