Roger Quinn v. USDC-IDB
| ROGER QUINN |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE |
| In re: ROGER QUINN and JOANNE KIBODEAUX |
| 20-72203 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, MARY M. SCHROEDER and CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN): Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of the court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977); see also Demos v. District Court, 925 F.2d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir. 1991) ([T]his court lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to a state court.). Accordingly, the petition is denied. Petitioners motion for a stay of state court proceedings (Docket Entry No. 2) and motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) are denied as moot. DENIED. [11769683] (AF) [Entered: 07/28/2020 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Petitioner Roger Quinn letter dated 07/27/2020 re: supplement to emergency motion. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11767773] (CW) [Entered: 07/27/2020 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Petitioner Roger Quinn motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/25/2020. [11766393][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 07/27/2020 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 07/27/2020 07:20 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Petitioner Roger Quinn EMERGENCY motion to stay lower court action. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/25/2020. [11766392](Motion inlcuded within the Petition for Writ of Mandamus) (BY) [Entered: 07/27/2020 07:20 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED EMERGENCY PROSE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11766389][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 07/27/2020 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 07/27/2020 07:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
