Fidelia Hernandez-Navarro, et al v. William Barr
| DENISSE CATALAN HERNANDEZ, FIDELIA HERNANDEZ-NAVARRO and JUAN DIEGO CATALAN HERNANDEZ |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 20-72214 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| FIDELIA HERNANDEZ-NAVARRO, ET AL V. MERRICK GARLAND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Resources Available As you get ready to prepare your opening brief, please consult the Immigration Outline ( # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/guides/immigration_outline.php ) prepared by court staff and also consider contacting the court's mentoring program (see Appellate Mentoring Program at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/attorneys/ ) for help with the brief and argument. (Notice sent to counsel for petitioner.) [11768201]. [20-72214] (CD) [Entered: 07/27/2020 05:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 08/31/2020. Response to motion for stay due 09/21/2020 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 10/30/2020 for Denisse Catalan Hernandez, Juan Diego Catalan Hernandez and Fidelia Hernandez-Navarro. Respondent brief due 12/29/2020 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11767188] (JPD) [Entered: 07/27/2020 12:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
