Alberto Flores v. William Barr
ALBERTO BOLAS FLORES |
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
20-72218 |
July 27, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review. COUNSELED. Petitioner detained? Unknown. Certified Administrative Record due 08/31/2020. Petitioner opening brief due 10/30/2020 for Alberto Bolas Flores. Respondent brief due 12/29/2020 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. (No BIA decision) [11767412] (JMR) [Entered: 07/27/2020 01:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Alberto Flores v. William Barr | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: ALBERTO BOLAS FLORES | |
Represented By: | Joseph LaCome Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General | |
Represented By: | Jessica Danielle Strokus |
Represented By: | OIL |
Represented By: | Anthony Cardozo Payne |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.