Joe Mark v. Earl Houser
| JOE HOMER MARK |
| EARL L. HOUSER |
| 20-72460 |
| August 18, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Check number 64123364 in the amount of $5.00 returned to DOC Offender Trust, Goose Creek Correctional Center, Wasilla AK as fee is not applicable for this appeal. [11794780] (JR) [Entered: 08/19/2020 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 1 Application for leave to file a second or successive petition filed. (Research) [11793202][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 08/19/2020 by BY](Original sent to SMS) (BY) [Entered: 08/18/2020 11:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Joe Mark v. Earl Houser | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOE HOMER MARK | |
| Represented By: | Joe Homer Mark |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: EARL L. HOUSER | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
