Pedro Arreola-Garcia v. Merrick Garland
PEDRO ARREOLA-GARCIA |
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General |
20-72527 |
August 25, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: GMW) On October 28, 2021, the court notified the parties that absent objection, this case would be remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for the agency to consider, in the first instance, the impact of Matter of Cruz-Valdez, 28 I. & N. Dec. 326 (A.G. 2021). Neither party having objected, this case is remanded. This order served on the agency acts as and for the mandate of this court. [12299769] (WL) [Entered: 11/29/2021 01:21 PM] |
Filing 17 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GMW): The court is inclined to remand this case to the Board of Immigration Appeals for the agency to consider, in the first instance, the impact of Matter of Cruz-Valdez, 28 I. & N. Dec. 326 (A.G. 2021). Any party who objects to remand must file a response to this order within 21 days explaining the ground for objection. If the court does not receive any objections, a remand order will issue. If the case is remanded, the court will retain jurisdiction to consider any issues that are raised in the briefs filed in this petition for review. If a stay of removal is currently in place, the stay will remain in place pending a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals. [12271413] (WL) [Entered: 10/28/2021 10:08 AM] |
Filing 16 NOTICE: Beginning May 1, 2021, all new counseled immigration petitions for review must be filed in the new Appellate Case Management System (ACMS). Chief Judge Sidney R. Thomas' April 23, 2021 administrative order regarding ACMS is available # here . The announcement about ACMS is available on our website # here .[12094595]. [20-72527] (CD) [Entered: 04/28/2021 10:24 PM] |
Filing 15 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 13 ] filed by Merrick B. Garland. [12053275] (AML) [Entered: 03/25/2021 11:38 AM] |
Filing 14 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 13 ] submitted by Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12048768] (LA) [Entered: 03/22/2021 10:30 AM] |
Filing 13 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. Date of service: 03/19/2021. [12048174] [20-72527] (Otunla, Enitan) [Entered: 03/19/2021 05:19 PM] |
Filing 12 Robert M. Wilkinson substituted by Merrick B. Garland effective 03/11/2021 [Created 03/11/2021 by AUTOUPD][12037454]. [20-72527] (CD) [Entered: 03/11/2021 06:24 PM] |
Filing 11 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SM): Granting motion [ # 10 ] to extend time to file brief filed by Respondent Robert M. Wilkinson. Respondent brief due 03/29/2021 for Robert M. Wilkinson, Acting Attorney General. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12015937] (SAM) [Entered: 02/24/2021 05:01 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Respondent Robert M. Wilkinson Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 03/29/2021. Date of service: 02/18/2021. [12008223] [20-72527] (Otunla, Enitan) [Entered: 02/18/2021 11:38 AM] |
Filing 9 Jeffrey A. Rosen substituted by Robert M. Wilkinson effective 01/20/2021 [Created 01/22/2021 by AUTOUPD][11976755]. [20-72527] (CD) [Entered: 01/22/2021 11:17 AM] |
Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Respondent Jeffrey A. Rosen to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent brief due 02/25/2021 for Jeffrey A. Rosen, Acting Attorney General. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11947584] (BG) [Entered: 12/29/2020 01:38 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Respondent Jeffrey A. Rosen. New requested due date is 02/25/2021. [11947551] [20-72527] (Otunla, Enitan) [Entered: 12/29/2020 01:29 PM] |
Filing 6 Willam P. Barr substituted by Jeffrey A. Rosen effective 12/24/2020 [Created 12/23/2020 by AUTOUPD][11943712]. [20-72527] (CD) [Entered: 12/23/2020 07:38 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed original and 7 copies of Petitioner Pedro Arreola-Garcia opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 11/24/2020. [11908093] (LA) [Entered: 11/27/2020 03:53 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Certified Administrative Record by Executive Office of Immigration Review. [11837514] [20-72527] (Executive Office Of Immigration Review, DOJ) [Entered: 09/25/2020 03:08 PM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Enitan Otunla for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, in case 20-72527. [11803009] (QDL) [Entered: 08/26/2020 08:38 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Enitan Omotayo Otunla (United States Department of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation PO Box 878 Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044) for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 08/26/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11802877] [20-72527] (Otunla, Enitan) [Entered: 08/26/2020 05:40 AM] |
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review. PRO SE. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 09/28/2020. Petitioner opening brief due 11/27/2020 for Pedro Arreola-Garcia. Respondent brief due 01/26/2021 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11801209][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 08/25/2020 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 08/25/2020 06:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.