David Smith v. Mona Houston
DAVID RANDOLPH SMITH |
MONA D. HOUSTON |
20-72698 |
September 9, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed application for leave to file a second or successive petition with attachments. (Transferred from the USDC, Los Angeles) (Research) [11818274] (AF) [Entered: 09/09/2020 05:33 PM] |
Filing 1 Received copy of District Court order filed on 09/02/2020 re: Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3(a), Petitioners request for authorization to file a second or successive petition is referred to the Court of Appeals. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [11818272] (AF) [Entered: 09/09/2020 05:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: David Smith v. Mona Houston | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MONA D. HOUSTON | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: DAVID RANDOLPH SMITH | |
Represented By: | David Randolph Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.