Eddie Haskin, Sr. v. Stuart Sherman
EDDIE EARL HASKIN, Sr. |
STUART SHERMAN, Warden |
20-72801 |
September 18, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed application for leave to file a second or successive petition with exhibits. (Transferred from the USDC, Los Angeles) (Research) [11829862] (AF) [Entered: 09/18/2020 04:40 PM] |
Filing 1 Received copy of District Court order filed on 09/12/2020 re: Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22-3(a), the Court refers the Petition to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for consideration as an application for leave to file a second or successive habeas petition. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [11829856] (AF) [Entered: 09/18/2020 04:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Eddie Haskin, Sr. v. Stuart Sherman | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: EDDIE EARL HASKIN, Sr. | |
Represented By: | Eddie Earl Haskin Sr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: STUART SHERMAN, Warden | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.