Khistina De Jean v. USDC-HI
| KHISTINA CALDWELL DE JEAN |
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII |
| SCOTT T. NAGO, in his Official Capacity as Chief Election Office of the State of Hawaii and In re: KHISTINA CALDWELL DE JEAN |
| 20-73167 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, MARSHA S. BERZON and JAY S. BYBEE) Petitioner has not demonstrated that this case warrants the intervention of this court by means of the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition is denied. We deny petitioners request for injunctive relief because we lack authority to grant such relief in the context of a petition for a writ of mandamus. See Fed. R. App. P. 8(a) (providing for authority to grant injunctive relief while an appeal is pending). No further filings will be accepted in this closed case. DENIED. [11872737] (JBS) [Entered: 10/27/2020 09:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE PETITIONER. NOTIFIED REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST OF FILING. [11871606] (JBS) [Entered: 10/26/2020 01:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
