Jose Aguilar, et al v. William Barr
TIRSSA IVANNIA AGUILAR-VELIZ, JOSE RAUL AGUILAR and ARMANDO RAUL AGUILAR-VELIZ |
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
20-73361 |
November 16, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Monica Marie Twombly for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, in case 20-73361. [11895302] (QDL) [Entered: 11/17/2020 08:59 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Monica M. Twombly (USDOJ, Civil Division-Office of Immigration Litigation, PO Box 878 Ben Franklin Station, Washington DC 20044) for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 11/17/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11895222] [20-73361] (Twombly, Monica) [Entered: 11/17/2020 08:26 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Petitioners Jose Raul Aguilar, et al. motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/13/2020. [11893497] (MAP) [Entered: 11/16/2020 08:49 AM] |
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. COUNSELED. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 12/18/2020. Response to motion for stay due 01/08/2021 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 02/16/2021 for Jose Raul Aguilar, et al. Respondent brief due 04/19/2021 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11893492] (MAP) [Entered: 11/16/2020 08:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.