Delmis Amaya-Corvera, et al v. William Barr
| MESIS ANTONIO GONZALEZ-AMAYA, DELMIS NOEMI AMAYA-CORVERA and KIMBERLYN NOEMI GONZALEZ-AMAYA |
| WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
| 20-73429 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Taryn L. Arbeiter for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, in case 20-73429. [11906830] (RR) [Entered: 11/25/2020 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Taryn L. Arbeiter (U.S. DOJ/CIVIL/Office of Immigration Litigation, P.O. Box 878, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044) for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 11/25/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11906372] [20-73429] (Arbeiter, Taryn) [Entered: 11/25/2020 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. PRO SE. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 12/28/2020. Response to motion for stay due 01/15/2021 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 02/23/2021 for Delmis Noemi Amaya-Corvera, et al. Respondent brief due 04/26/2021 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11901764][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 11/23/2020 by BY][COURT UPDATE: Correct pdf attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 11/24/2020 by BY] (MAP) [Entered: 11/20/2020 03:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
