Franci Flores Flores, et al v. William Barr
FRANCI FERNANDO FLORES FLORES and ASHLEY FERNANDA FLORES CASTRO |
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General |
20-73639 |
December 14, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed Petitioners Ashley Fernanda Flores Castro and Franci Fernando Flores Flores motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/09/2020. [11925865]--[COURT UPDATE: To attach document; resent NDA - 12/15/2020 by HH] (JBS) [Entered: 12/14/2020 10:26 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Petitioners Ashley Fernanda Flores Castro and Franci Fernando Flores Flores motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/09/2020. [11925863]--[COURT UPDATE: To attach document; resent NDA - 12/15/2020 by HH] (JBS) [Entered: 12/14/2020 10:26 AM] |
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. PRO SE. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 01/19/2021. Response to motion for stay due 02/08/2021 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 03/19/2021 for Ashley Fernanda Flores Castro and Franci Fernando Flores Flores. Respondent brief due 05/18/2021 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. (Motion for IFP & Appointment of Counsel within petition) [11925858]--[COURT UPDATE: To attach document; resent NDA - 12/15/2020 by HH] (JBS) [Entered: 12/14/2020 10:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.