Jorge Cruz, et al v. Jeffrey Rosen
JEFFERSON GUSTAVO ISMAEL CRUZ-AGUIRRE, JORGE GUSTAVO CRUZ and MARIA YANETH AGUIRRE-MACOLAS DE CRUZ |
JEFFREY A. ROSEN, Acting Attorney General |
20-73717 |
December 18, 2020 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Willam P. Barr substituted by Jeffrey A. Rosen effective 12/24/2020 [Created 12/23/2020 by AUTOUPD][11944610]. [20-73717] (CD) [Entered: 12/23/2020 08:01 PM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Gerald M. Alexander for party(s) Respondent William P. Barr, in case 20-73717. [11935027] (RR) [Entered: 12/21/2020 01:02 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Gerald M. Alexander (Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Department of Justice, P.O. Box 878, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, DC 20044) for Respondent William P. Barr. Date of service: 12/21/2020. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11934952] [20-73717] (Alexander, Gerald) [Entered: 12/21/2020 12:40 PM] |
Filing 1 FILED BIA Petition for Review and Motion for Stay. PRO SE. Pursuant to G.O. 6.4(c) A TEMPORARY STAY OF REMOVAL IS IN EFFECT pending further order. Petitioner detained? NO. Certified Administrative Record due 01/22/2021. Response to motion for stay due 02/12/2021 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Petitioner opening brief due 03/23/2021 for , Jorge Gustavo Cruz, et al. Respondent brief due 05/24/2021 for William P. Barr, Attorney General. Optional reply brief is due 21 days from service of respondent brief. [11933089][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 12/21/2020 by BY] (BY) [Entered: 12/18/2020 01:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.