Hernandez Robles, et al. v. Garland
| AURORA GUADALUPE HERNANDEZ ROBLES, RICARDO ALEXIS HERNANDEZ ROBLES and PALOMA ALEJANDRA DOMINGUEZ HERNANDEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-105 |
| May 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 35
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion to remand this matter to the Board of Immigration Appeals (Docket Entry No. 34) is granted. Petitioners removal is stayed pending a Board decision in this matter. As stated in the unopposed motion, the parties shall bear their own fees and costs. This order served on the agency shall act as the mandate of this court. REMANDED. [Entered: 01/05/2023 02:34 PM]
|
| Filing 34 MOTION to remand case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/03/2023 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 33 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 28 by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez, and Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles received. [Entered: 12/09/2022 02:50 PM] |
| Filing 32 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Rodolfo D. Saenz representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/05/2022 04:27 PM] |
| Filing 31 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Zoe Jaye Heller for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/05/2022 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 30 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Zoe Jaye Heller for Merrick B. Garland replacing Rodolfo D. Saenz. [Entered: 12/05/2022 02:17 PM] |
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 28 by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner, Petitioner, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:07 PM]
|
| Filing 28 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 12/02/2022 10:08 AM] [Edited: 12/02/2022 12:04 PM] |
|
Filing 27
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 26) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due December 2, 2022. The answering brief is due January 31, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/05/2022 08:30:00 AM]
|
| Filing 26 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 10/03/2022 05:16:00 PM] |
|
Filing 25
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 24) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 3, 2022. The answering brief is due December 2, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/18/2022 03:44:00 PM]
|
| Filing 24 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 07/05/2022 05:45:00 PM] |
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 22) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 5, 2022. The answering brief is due September 6, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/06/2022 04:30:00 PM]
|
| Filing 22 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 04/05/2022 10:28:00 AM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 20) granted in part, Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (DE 18) withdrawn, Motion to Strike Filing or Portion of Filing (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/4/2022. Respondent Answering Brief due 6/3/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/02/2022 03:13:00 PM]
|
| Filing 20 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 01/31/2022 11:26:00 AM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION to strike filing or portion of filing filed by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 01/28/2022 11:56:00 AM] |
| Filing 18 STRICKEN PER ORDER AT DE 21 --- MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Benjamin Wiesinger for Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 01/21/2022 08:23:00 AM] [Edited: 02/02/2022 03:58:00 PM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 16) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/21/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/22/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/17/2021 09:42:00 AM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 11/16/2021 02:08:00 PM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 14) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/22/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 1/21/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/22/2021 02:00:00 PM]
|
| Filing 14 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 09/21/2021 03:54:00 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 9/22/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 11/22/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/23/2021 09:23:00 AM]
|
| Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Aurora Guadalupe Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Ricardo Alexis Hernandez Robles, Petitioner Paloma Alejandra Dominguez Hernandez. [Entered: 08/23/2021 09:03:00 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Motion to Stay Removal (DE 3) not opposed. [Entered: 07/02/2021 01:38:00 PM]
|
| Filing 10 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent. [Entered: 06/30/2021 03:51:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 06/07/2021 11:48:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 FEE PAID by Petitioner(s), receipt 4709005047. [Entered: 05/26/2021 11:24:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Rodolfo D. Saenz for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/19/2021 02:55:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rodolfo D. Saenz for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/19/2021 02:14:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/23/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 7/14/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/23/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/21/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/19/2021 01:06:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/19/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-105 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/19/2021 01:01:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/19/2021 11:33:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/19/2021 11:33:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 4/23/2021. [Entered: 05/19/2021 11:32:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
