Lopez-Lorenzano v. Garland
Petitioner: MARIA DEL CARMEN LOPEZ-LORENZANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 21-1055
Filed: November 3, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2022 Filing 16 MANDATE ISSUED Richard C. TALLMAN, Morgan B. CHRISTEN, Jacqueline H. NGUYEN [Entered: 03/14/2022 10:51:00 AM]
January 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Richard C. TALLMAN, Morgan B. CHRISTEN, Jacqueline H. NGUYEN Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (DE 14) granted, Motion for Appointment of Counsel (DE 4) denied as moot, Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) denied. [Entered: 01/20/2022 12:26:00 PM]
December 22, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/22/2021 01:12:00 PM]
December 22, 2021 Filing 13 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/22/2021 01:11:00 PM]
December 3, 2021 Filing 12 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 12/03/2021 09:07:00 AM]
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (DE 3) granted. [Entered: 11/08/2021 04:09:00 PM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 10 ADDED Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/04/2021 09:13:00 AM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 9 ADDED Jessica Danielle Strokus for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/04/2021 09:12:00 AM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Cardozo Payne for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/04/2021 05:28:00 AM]
November 4, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jessica Danielle Strokus for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/04/2021 05:23:00 AM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/8/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 12/29/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/7/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 4/7/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/03/2021 01:24:00 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/3/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-1055 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/03/2021 01:22:00 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/03/2021 01:21:00 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/03/2021 01:21:00 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/03/2021 01:21:00 PM]
November 3, 2021 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/03/2021 01:21:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lopez-Lorenzano v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MARIA DEL CARMEN LOPEZ-LORENZANO
Represented By: Maria Del Carmen Lopez-Lorenzano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Mr. Anthony Cardozo Payne
Represented By: Jessica Danielle Strokus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?