Trejo de Orellana v. Garland
| ELSA MARLENE TREJO DE ORELLANA and DUSTIN ALEXANDER ORELLANA TREJO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-1073 |
| November 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| TREJO DE ORELLANA, ET AL. V. GARLAND |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 40
MANDATE ISSUED Kenneth K. LEE, Daniel A. BRESS, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr. [Entered: 05/30/2023 08:51 AM]
|
|
Filing 39
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Kenneth K. LEE, Daniel A. BRESS, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr.) The temporary stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues. The motion for clarification, ACMS No. 38, is denied as moot. PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 04/07/2023 09:34 AM]
|
|
Filing 38
MOTION for clarification filed by Petitioner Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana, Petitioner Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo. [Entered: 03/16/2023 02:51 PM]
|
|
Filing 37
ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Kenneth K. LEE, Daniel A. BRESS, Salvador MENDOZA, Jr.. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 03/15/2023 10:27 AM]
|
|
Filing 36
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Jennifer A. Singer for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/11/2023 10:55 AM]
|
|
Filing 35
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Lisa Pickering for Petitioner Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana, Petitioner Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo. [Entered: 01/11/2023 10:40 AM]
|
|
Filing 34
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, March 15, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 3 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 01/03/2023 09:38 AM]
|
|
Filing 33
ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Lisa Pickering for Petitioner Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo, Petitioner Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana. [Entered: 12/27/2022 04:53 PM]
|
|
Filing 32
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lisa Pickering for Petitioner Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo, Petitioner Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana. [Entered: 12/27/2022 04:47 PM]
|
|
Filing 31
RESPONSE to notice of case being considered for oral argument filed by Ramin Ghashghaei. [Entered: 11/18/2022 04:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 30
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena, CA. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for March 6-10 and March 13-17, 2023 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 11/16/2022 02:32 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 27 by Petitioners Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo and Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana received. [Entered: 06/30/2022 02:27:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 27 by Petitioner Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo, Petitioner Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/27/2022 03:21:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana, Petitioner Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo. (COURT ENTERED FILING to replace DE 26) [Entered: 06/27/2022 03:16:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
DEFECTIVE --- SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana, Petitioner Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo. [Entered: 06/24/2022 04:05:00 PM]--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 27] [Edited: 06/27/2022 03:18:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 25
Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 23 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 06/14/2022 02:10:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 23 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/08/2022 02:22:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/08/2022 08:47:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 21) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due June 8, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/29/2022 02:51:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/29/2022 11:20:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 5/9/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/28/2022 03:09:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/28/2022 11:52:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 18
TERMINATED participation of Carmel Aileen Morgan representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/28/2022 11:45:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
ADDED Jennifer A. Singer for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/28/2022 11:44:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jennifer A. Singer for Merrick B. Garland replacing Carmel Aileen Morgan. [Entered: 03/28/2022 11:37:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioners Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo and Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana received. [Entered: 02/10/2022 04:38:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioners Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana and Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/04/2022 04:23:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Elsa Marlene Trejo de Orellana, Petitioner Dustin Alexander Orellana Trejo. [Entered: 02/04/2022 12:59:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. Motion to Stay Removal (DE 5) not opposed. [Entered: 12/20/2021 03:59:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/20/2021 01:58:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 12/08/2021 10:11:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ADDED Carmel Aileen Morgan for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/05/2021 11:32:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmel Aileen Morgan for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/05/2021 09:19:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/9/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 12/30/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/7/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 4/8/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/04/2021 04:10:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/4/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-1073 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2021 04:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/04/2021 04:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
AGENCY DECISION on review dated 10/12/2021. [Entered: 11/04/2021 04:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
AGENCY DECISION on review dated 10/12/2021. [Entered: 11/04/2021 04:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
AGENCY DECISION on review dated 10/12/2021. [Entered: 11/04/2021 04:08:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/04/2021 04:08:00 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
