Ortega Barranco v. Garland
FERNANDO ORTEGA BARRANCO |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
21-1090 |
November 5, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 MANDATE ISSUED Jay S. BYBEE, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Ryan D. NELSON [Entered: 07/19/2022 08:42:00 AM] |
Filing 19 ORDER FILED. Jay S. BYBEE, Andrew D. HURWITZ, Ryan D. NELSON Petitioners removal proceedings were reopened on February 25, 2022. When removal proceedings are reopened, there is no longer a final order of removal that this court has jurisdiction to review. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(a)(1); Lopez-Ruiz v. Ashcroft, 298 F.3d 886, 887 (9th Cir. 2002). The governments unopposed motion to dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry No. 18) is granted. The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate. PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED. [Entered: 05/27/2022 10:11:00 AM] |
Filing 18 MOTION to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/04/2022 10:49:00 AM] |
Filing 17 TERMINATED participation of Luther Snavely representing Petitioner Fernando Ortega Barranco. [Entered: 02/02/2022 03:28:00 PM] |
Filing 16 ADDED Omar Carlos Christian for Petitioner Fernando Ortega Barranco. [Entered: 02/02/2022 03:28:00 PM] |
Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Omar Carlos Christian for Fernando Ortega Barranco replacing Luther Snavely. [Entered: 02/02/2022 03:25:00 PM] |
Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/10/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 5/9/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/02/2022 03:05:00 PM] |
Filing 13 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Fernando Ortega Barranco. [Entered: 02/02/2022 02:29:00 PM] |
Filing 12 ADDED Luther Snavely for Petitioner Fernando Ortega Barranco. [Entered: 01/21/2022 03:46:00 PM] |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Luther Snavely for Fernando Ortega Barranco. [Entered: 01/21/2022 02:14:00 PM] |
Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 12/08/2021 09:38:00 AM] |
Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed, Supplemental Motion to Stay Removal (DE 7) not opposed. [Entered: 11/30/2021 01:59:00 PM] |
Filing 8 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/30/2021 07:35:00 AM] |
Filing 7 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Fernando Ortega Barranco. [Entered: 11/19/2021 11:03:00 AM] |
Filing 6 ADDED Micah Engler for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/09/2021 09:40:00 AM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Micah Engler for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/09/2021 07:35:00 AM] |
Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/10/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 1/3/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/8/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 4/11/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/05/2021 04:24:00 PM] |
Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/5/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-1090 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/05/2021 04:21:00 PM] |
Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/05/2021 04:20:00 PM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/05/2021 04:20:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Ortega Barranco v. Garland | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: FERNANDO ORTEGA BARRANCO | |
Represented By: | Mr. Reza Athari |
Represented By: | Mr. Omar Carlos Christian |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
Represented By: | Mr. Micah Engler |
Represented By: | OIL |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.