Pena-Lemus v. Garland
| ADAN PENA-LEMUS |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-112 |
| May 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Petitioner has failed to file the opening brief in this case. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 09/19/2022 11:26:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. The stay of appellate proceedings ended on June 21, 2022 and no motion for further relief was filed. The stay of appellate proceedings is lifted. The opening brief is now due August 12, 2022. The answering brief is due October 11, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/14/2022 01:21:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Motion to Hold in Abeyance (DE 15) granted. [Entered: 01/10/2022 12:38:00 PM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to hold case in abeyance filed by Petitioner Adan Pena-Lemus. [Entered: 12/23/2021 11:16:00 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/22/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 1/21/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 11/02/2021 04:59:00 PM]
|
| Filing 13 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Adan Pena-Lemus. [Entered: 10/22/2021 12:37:00 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 11) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 10/22/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 12/21/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/05/2021 04:36:00 PM]
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Adan Pena-Lemus. [Entered: 09/22/2021 02:41:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Lindsay Marshall for Merrick B. Garland Respondent. [Entered: 09/21/2021 11:40:00 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lindsay Marshall for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/21/2021 11:03:00 AM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 7) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 9/22/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 11/22/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/24/2021 10:27:00 AM]
|
| Filing 7 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Adan Pena-Lemus. [Entered: 08/23/2021 01:38:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Arthur Rabin for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/04/2021 02:00:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Arthur Rabin for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/04/2021 01:55:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 06/04/2021 10:40:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/23/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/23/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/21/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/19/2021 04:14:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/19/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-112 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/19/2021 04:11:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/19/2021 10:20:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pena-Lemus v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ADAN PENA-LEMUS | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Ramiro Jose Lluis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Lindsay Marshall |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Mr. Arthur Rabin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
