Claudio-Guadarrama v. Garland
| SANTIAGO CLAUDIO-GUADARRAMA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-117 |
| May 20, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 38 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for March 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [21-117] [Entered: 11/06/2023 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 37 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for February 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [21-117] [Entered: 10/05/2023 09:22 AM] |
| Filing 36 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 34 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/05/2023 02:33 PM] |
Filing 35
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 34 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/30/2023 11:05 AM]
|
| Filing 34 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/30/2023 09:19 AM] |
| Filing 33 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Roberta O. Roberts representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/21/2023 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 32 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Michael Christopher Heyse for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/21/2023 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 31 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Christopher Heyse for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Roberta O. Roberts. [Entered: 08/21/2023 08:18 AM] |
| Filing 30 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 23 by Petitioner Santiago Claudio-Guadarrama received. [Entered: 08/18/2023 03:01 PM] |
|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 23 by Petitioner Santiago Claudio-Guadarrama is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/28/2023 03:08 PM]
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. SILVERMAN, R. NELSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. On May 6, 2022, the court dismissed this petition for review for failure to prosecute because petitioner had not filed the opening brief. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. Petitioner has now submitted the opening brief. The motion to reinstate this petition is granted (Docket Entry No. 22). The May 6, 2022 order is vacated, and the petition for review is reinstated. The temporary stay of removal is also reinstated pursuant to the courts July 16, 2021 order. The certified administrative record has been filed. The Clerk will file the opening brief at Docket Entry No. 23. The answering brief is due September 5, 2023, and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/28/2023 02:29 PM]
|
| Filing 27 TERMINATED participation of Katherine S. Fischer representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/30/2022 01:50:00 PM] |
| Filing 26 ADDED Roberta O. Roberts for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/30/2022 01:40:00 PM] |
| Filing 25 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Roberta O. Roberts for Merrick B. Garland replacing Katherine S. Fischer, replacing OIL. [Entered: 06/30/2022 07:51:00 AM] |
| Filing 24 RESPONSE to Motion to Reinstate (DE 22) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/27/2022 07:23:00 AM] |
| Filing 23 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Santiago Claudio-Guadarrama. [Entered: 06/20/2022 05:09:00 PM]--[COURT UPDATE: attached corrected PDF of opening brief.] [Edited: 06/22/2022 11:10:00 AM] |
| Filing 22 MOTION to reinstate case filed by Petitioner Santiago Claudio-Guadarrama. [Entered: 06/20/2022 05:07:00 PM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Petitioner has failed to file the opening brief in this case. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 05/06/2022 10:51:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Motion to Hold in Abeyance (DE 19) denied, Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 18) granted. See order for more details. [Entered: 02/14/2022 03:56:00 PM]
|
| Filing 19 MOTION to hold in abeyance filed by Petitioner Santiago Claudio-Guadarrama. [Entered: 02/09/2022 11:24:00 AM] |
| Filing 18 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Santiago Claudio-Guadarrama. [Entered: 01/31/2022 11:21:00 AM] |
| Filing 17 DEFECTIVE -- MOTION to reinstate case filed by Petitioner Santiago Claudio-Guadarrama. [Entered: 01/28/2022 10:56:00 AM] Court Update: Incorrect Filing Type used. Correct entry at DE 19. [Edited: 02/11/2022 04:04:00 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/28/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 3/29/2022 [Entered: 12/03/2021 11:56:00 AM]
|
| Filing 15 ADDED Margaret Kuehne Taylor for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/19/2021 08:57:00 AM] |
| Filing 14 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Margaret Kuehne Taylor for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/18/2021 07:09:00 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 12) granted. [Entered: 09/02/2021 04:19:00 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Santiago Claudio-Guadarrama. [Entered: 08/27/2021 11:15:00 AM] |
| Filing 11 FEE PAID by Petitioner(s). (Check # 8471)[Entered: 07/22/2021 06:58:00 AM] |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. [Entered: 07/16/2021 04:41:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 3) not opposed. [Entered: 07/16/2021 03:59:00 PM]
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 06/09/2021 06:15:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Katherine S. Fischer for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/21/2021 08:36:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Katherine S. Fischer for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/21/2021 08:31:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/24/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 7/15/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/23/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 10/22/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/20/2021 03:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/20/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-117 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/20/2021 03:20:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/20/2021 03:02:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 4/21/2021. [Entered: 05/20/2021 03:01:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/20/2021 03:00:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
