Rios Avalos v. Garland
| JOSE ANTONIO RIOS AVALOS |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-1170 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 33
MANDATE ISSUED Mary H. MURGUIA, Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Mark J. BENNETT [Entered: 07/07/2023 08:40 AM]
|
|
Filing 32
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Mary H. MURGUIA, Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Mark J. BENNETT) Rios's motion to supplement the record (Doc. 8) is denied. PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 05/15/2023 10:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 31
SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS to Mary H. MURGUIA, Diarmuid F. O'SCANNLAIN, Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Mark J. BENNETT. [Entered: 05/09/2023 03:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 30
ORDER FILED. The Court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, this case is ordered submitted without oral argument on Tuesday, May 9, 2023, in San Francisco, California. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). [Entered: 04/17/2023 01:33 PM]
|
|
Filing 29
ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Joseph Anthony O'Connell for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/12/2023 08:31 AM]
|
|
Filing 28
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Tuesday, May 9, 2023 - 09:30 A.M. - Courtroom 3 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 03/08/2023 02:17 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco, CA. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for May 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 01/24/2023 02:39 PM]
|
|
Filing 26
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco, CA. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for April 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 12/19/2022 09:40 AM]
|
|
Filing 25
Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 23 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 08/25/2022 03:27:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 24
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 23 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/19/2022 08:33:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 23
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/18/2022 01:19:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 21) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due August 22, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 07/14/2022 11:57:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/12/2022 07:25:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 19) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due July 22, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/15/2022 03:22:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 19
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/14/2022 08:59:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due June 22, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/23/2022 02:03:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/20/2022 10:41:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 15) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due May 23, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/14/2022 02:05:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/14/2022 07:30:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
TERMINATED participation of Tracie Nicole Jones representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:19:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
ADDED Joseph Anthony O'Connell for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:18:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joseph Anthony O'Connell for Merrick B. Garland replacing Tracie Nicole Jones. [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:16:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 8) to supplement the record, the proposed supplement (included in Docket Entry No. 8), and any further responses are referred to the panel that will consider the merits of the case. Any discussion of the supplemental materials in the parties briefs may be stricken or disregarded if the merits panel denies petitioners motion to supplement the record. The answering brief remains due April 21, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/28/2022 02:03:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Petitioner Jose Antonio Rios Avalos received. [Entered: 02/28/2022 03:53:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 7 by Petitioner Jose Antonio Rios Avalos is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 02/23/2022 10:11:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to supplement the record filed by Petitioner Jose Antonio Rios Avalos. [Entered: 02/23/2022 09:47:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 7
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Antonio Rios Avalos. [Entered: 02/21/2022 02:10:00 PM]--[COURT UPDATE: attached corrected PDF of brief and addendum.] [Edited: 02/23/2022 10:09:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 12/21/2021 10:08:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
ADDED Tracie Nicole Jones for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/02/2021 10:00:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tracie Nicole Jones for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/02/2021 08:43:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/22/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/21/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 4/21/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:40:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/17/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-1170 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:38:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/17/2021 04:19:00 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rios Avalos v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSE ANTONIO RIOS AVALOS | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Lilia Rodriguez, I, AT |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Joseph Anthony O'Connell |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
