Torres-Mendez v. Garland
| MAYRA TORRES-MENDEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-1398 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 36
ORDER FILED. Jay S. BYBEE, Danielle J. FORREST, Andrew P. Gordon Upon review, the panel judges are satisfied with counsels response and explanation to the previously issued order to show cause. As such, the order to show cause is discharged. [Entered: 06/30/2023 10:45 AM]
|
|
Filing 35
MANDATE ISSUED Jay S. BYBEE, Danielle J. FORREST, Andrew P. Gordon [Entered: 06/23/2023 07:34 AM]
|
|
Filing 34
RESPONSE to Court order (DE 32) filed by Petitioner Mayra Torres-Mendez. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 33.] [Entered: 06/20/2023 01:04 PM] [Edited: 06/20/2023 01:13 PM]
|
|
Filing 33
DEFICIENT---MOTION to supplement or correct the record filed by Petitioner Mayra Torres-Mendez. [Wrong filing type used, correct entry is DE 34.] [Entered: 06/20/2023 12:33 PM] [Edited: 06/20/2023 01:14 PM]
|
|
Filing 32
ORDER FILED. Jay S. BYBEE, Danielle J. FORREST, Andrew P. Gordon The panel judges have voted to deny petitioners petition for panel rehearing. Petitioners petition for panel rehearing, filed May 26, 2023, is DENIED. Within fourteen days, petitioners counsel shall provide the court with an explanation for the lack of professionalism it demonstrated in submitting this petition with a file titled 9th Cir hispanis taco. [Entered: 06/15/2023 10:01 AM]
|
|
Filing 31
PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING filed by Petitioner Mayra Torres-Mendez. [Entered: 05/26/2023 02:55 PM]
|
|
Filing 30
MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Jay S. BYBEE, Danielle J. FORREST, Andrew P. Gordon) PETITION DISMISSED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 04/14/2023 10:21 AM]
|
|
Filing 29
SUBMITTED ON THE BRIEFS to Jay S. BYBEE, Danielle J. FORREST, Andrew P. Gordon. [Entered: 04/10/2023 09:09 AM]
|
|
Filing 28
ORDER FILED. The Court is of the unanimous opinion that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the briefs and record and that oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process. Therefore, the joint motion to remove case from oral argument docket and submit on the briefs is GRANTED. This matter is ordered submitted on the briefs and record without oral argument on April 10, 2023, in Seattle. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:10 PM]
|
|
Filing 27
MOTION to submit case on briefs without oral argument filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/06/2023 05:47 AM]
|
|
Filing 26
NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Monday, April 10, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 2 - Scheduled Location: Seattle View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 01/30/2023 09:05 AM]
|
|
Filing 25
NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Seattle, WA. Please review the Seattle sitting dates for April 10-14, 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motoin within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [Entered: 12/08/2022 08:37 AM]
|
|
Filing 24
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 17 by Petitioner Mayra Torres-Mendez received. [Entered: 10/17/2022 02:07 PM]
|
|
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 22 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/11/2022 02:30 PM]
|
|
Filing 22
ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/11/2022 10:40 AM]
|
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 20) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 10/27/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/23/2022 09:06:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 20
STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file answering brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/23/2022 07:09:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 19
Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 17 by Petitioner Mayra Torres-Mendez received. [Entered: 08/29/2022 04:52:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 17 by Petitioner Mayra Torres-Mendez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/29/2022 10:01:34 AM]
|
|
Filing 17
OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Mayra Torres-Mendez. [Entered: 07/29/2022 08:34:33 AM]
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 15) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 29, 2022. The answering brief is due September 27, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/29/2022 09:52:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Mayra Torres-Mendez. [Entered: 06/28/2022 08:08:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 13) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due June 29, 2022. The answering brief is due August 29, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/29/2022 01:43:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Mayra Torres-Mendez. [Entered: 04/29/2022 09:57:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 03/08/2022 05:09:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/08/2022 12:52:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 01/31/2022 09:41:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Certified Administrative Record (DE 8) granted. Certified Administrative Record due 2/25/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 3/18/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/26/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 6/27/2022. [Entered: 01/27/2022 11:28:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to extend time to file Certified Administrative Record filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/25/2022 12:19:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 7
ADDED Craig William Kuhn for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/23/2021 10:06:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Craig William Kuhn for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/23/2021 08:51:00 AM]
|
|
Filing 5
BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 1/26/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 2/16/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/28/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 5/26/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/22/2021 04:48:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 12/22/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-1398 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/22/2021 04:46:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 12/22/2021 04:26:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 2
AGENCY DECISION on review dated 12/7/2021. [Entered: 12/22/2021 04:25:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 12/22/2021 04:25:00 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Torres-Mendez v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MAYRA TORRES-MENDEZ | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas W. Marchi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Craig William Kuhn |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
