Ojeda v. Garland
| JESUS GOMEZ OJEDA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-1418 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 29
ORDER FILED. Pursuant to respondents unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 27), the Clerk will close this courts docket for administrative purposes until further order of the court. This order is not a decision on the merits and has no impact on any stay of removal. No mandate will issue, and at any time any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened, or the court may reopen the petition sua sponte. Within 14 days after a determination at the agency level that petitioner is eligible for discretionary relief, the parties are expected to file a motion to remand. The parties may request a referral to mediation at any time it might benefit the case. [Entered: 10/27/2022 10:24 AM]
|
| Filing 28 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION. [Entered: 10/20/2022 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 27 MOTION to administratively close case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/19/2022 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 26 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Respondent Status Report due 10/27/2022. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 10/13/2022 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 25 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE. Petitioner Status Report due 9/12/2022. DIAL-IN conference 10/13/2022, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 08/10/2022 10:34:00 AM] |
| Filing 24 MEDIATION ORDER. Petitioner Status Report due 6/29/2022. DIAL-IN conference 8/10/2022, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 06/15/2022 10:43:00 AM] |
| Filing 23 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN 6/14/2022, 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time (originally 6/9/2022). [Entered: 06/02/2022 09:16:00 AM] |
| Filing 22 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 6/9/2022, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [Entered: 05/27/2022 03:27:00 PM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 20) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due June 10, 2022. The answering brief is due August 9, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 10) to refer this case to mediation will be addressed in a future order. [Entered: 05/17/2022 09:37:00 AM]
|
| Filing 20 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Jesus Gomez Ojeda. [Entered: 05/12/2022 07:02:00 PM] |
| Filing 19 MOTION to refer to mediation filed by Petitioner Jesus Gomez Ojeda. [Entered: 05/10/2022 06:39:00 PM] |
|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Petitioner Opening Brief due 5/12/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 7/11/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 03/22/2022 04:04:00 PM]
|
| Filing 17 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jesus Gomez Ojeda. [Entered: 03/22/2022 08:46:00 AM] |
| Filing 16 ADDED Maleha Nasar Khan-Avila for Petitioner Jesus Gomez Ojeda. [Entered: 02/25/2022 11:50:00 AM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Maleha Nasar Khan-Avila for Jesus Gomez Ojeda. [Entered: 02/25/2022 11:31:00 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed. [Entered: 02/15/2022 04:01:00 PM]
|
| Filing 13 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/15/2022 10:18:00 AM] |
| Filing 12 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 02/04/2022 08:28:00 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Certified Administrative Record (DE 10) granted. Certified Administrative Record due 2/11/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 3/4/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/12/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 6/13/2022. [Entered: 01/27/2022 11:58:00 AM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to extend time to file Certified Administrative Record filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 01/25/2022 07:47:00 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (DE 3) granted. [Entered: 01/13/2022 02:17:00 PM]
|
| Filing 8 ADDED Jane Tracey Schaffner for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/30/2021 08:42:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jane Tracey Schaffner for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/30/2021 07:40:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 2/1/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 2/22/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 4/4/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 6/1/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/28/2021 10:14:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 12/28/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-1418 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/28/2021 10:12:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 12/1/2021. [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:31:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:30:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:30:00 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 12/28/2021 09:29:00 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Ojeda v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JESUS GOMEZ OJEDA | |
| Represented By: | Maleha Nasar Khan-Avila |
| Represented By: | Ms. Erika Roman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Jane Tracey Schaffner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
