Shawn Frost, Sr. v. Clark Ducart, et al
| T. S. BUCHANAN, Captain, C. BROWN, D. WILCOX, Correctional Counselor II, D. W. BRADBURY, Chief Deputy Warden, M. HODGES, Captain, Office of Appeals, M. PATSEL, D. HIGGERSON, Lt., J. NARRO, J. SCHRAGG, Sgt., J. PUENTE, JAMES BARNEBURG III, J. HALLOCK, C. OLSEN, Associate Warden, C. J. PARRY, S. WRIGHT, J. LACY, CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, Warden, ROBERT LOSACCO, J. PRESTON, J. KREINDLER, J. SCALIA, T. TOUSSAINT, Correctional Officer, G. POPE, M. TOWNSEND, J. NAVARRO, M. VOONG, Chief Office of Appeals and CLARK E. DUCART, Warden |
| SHAWN KEVIN FROST, Sr. |
| 21-15008 |
| January 4, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (SL): The court has been informed that this matter is resolved. By March 18, 2021, appellant shall file either a motion or a stipulation to dismiss this matter pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The briefing schedule previously set by the court is vacated. [12016386] (AF) [Entered: 02/25/2021 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (VLS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Each participant on the attached list will receive an email with dial-in information. If there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Also, please notify Chief Circuit Mediator Stephen Liacouras immediately by email (stephen_liacouras@ca9.uscourts.gov) if a participant has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. Please copy all participants on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All discussions that take place in the context of the assessment conference are confidential. See Circuit Rule 33-1. For more detailed information about the assessment conference, confidentiality, and the Mediation Program and its procedures generally, please see the attachment to this order and the Mediation Program web site: www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. (Date: February 24, 2021 Time: 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time) [11986829] (AF) [Entered: 01/29/2021 05:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Shawn Kevin Frost, Sr. opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 01/15/2021. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiency: fees are due, no certificate of service. Notified Appellant. [11965745] (KWG) [Entered: 01/15/2021 12:22 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11958053] (CKP) [Entered: 01/10/2021 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shawn Kevin Frost Sr. opening brief due 03/05/2021. Appellees James Barneburg III, D. W. Bradbury, C. Brown, T. S. Buchanan, Clark E. Ducart, Warden, J. Hallock, D. Higgerson, M. Hodges, J. Kreindler, J. Lacy, Robert Losacco, J. Narro, J. Navarro, C. Olsen, C. J. Parry, M. Patsel, G. Pope, J. Preston, J. Puente, J. Scalia, J. Schragg, T. Toussaint, M. Townsend, M. Voong, D. Wilcox and S. Wright answering brief due 04/05/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11951449] (JMR) [Entered: 01/04/2021 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
