Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
LG CHEM, LTD., SANYO NORTH AMERICA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, LG CHEM AMERICA, INC., SANYO ELECTRIC CO, LTD, HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI MAXWELL, LTD., TOSHIBA AMERICA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS, INC., PANASONIC CORPORATION, SONY CORPORATION, NEC TOKIN CORPORATION, SONY ENERGY DEVICES CORPORATION, TOSHIBA CORPORATION, SAMSUNG SDI CO. LTD., SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., MAXWELL CORPORATION OF AMERICA and NEC CORPORATION |
STEVEN FRANKLYN HELFAND |
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS |
In re: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION |
21-15022 |
January 5, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: JW) Appellants motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 10 ]) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12008390] (WL) [Entered: 02/18/2021 01:13 PM] |
Filing 11 Terminated James F. Lerner for Sanyo North America Corporation, Sanyo Electric Co, Ltd, Panasonic Corporation of North America and Panasonic Corporation in 21-15022, 21-15120, 21-15138 and 21-15200 (due to incorrect ECF contact information) [12007998] [21-15022, 21-15200, 21-15120, 21-15138] (RY) [Entered: 02/18/2021 10:24 AM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs Correspondence: Letter to Court requesting permission to file Voluntary Dismissal of Appeal on behalf of Appellant Steven Franklyn Helfand, per his request.. Date of service: 02/16/2021 [12005502] [21-15022]--[COURT UPDATE: Spread docket text to 21-15200. 02/17/2021 by SLM] (Zapala, Adam) [Entered: 02/16/2021 05:58 PM] |
Filing 9 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/10/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12000092]. [21-15022] (AD) [Entered: 02/10/2021 06:44 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 21-15200 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/10/2021. [11999310] [21-15200, 21-15022, 21-15120, 21-15138] (Scarlett, Shana) [Entered: 02/10/2021 12:45 PM] |
Filing 7 Terminated Nancy L. Fineman for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs in 21-15022, 21-15120, 21-15138, and 21-15200 (for failure to register for Appellate ECF) [11995759] [21-15022, 21-15200, 21-15120, 21-15138] (JBS) [Entered: 02/08/2021 10:35 AM] |
Filing 6 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Appellant Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/10/2021. First cross appeal brief due 05/04/2021 for Christopher Andrews, Michael Frank Bednarz and Steven Franklyn Helfand. Second brief on cross appeal due 06/04/2021 for Hitachi Maxwell, Ltd., Hitachi, Ltd., Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, LG Chem America, Inc., LG Chem, Ltd., Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation, Maxwell Corporation of America, NEC Corporation, NEC Tokin Corporation, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Sanyo Electric Co, Ltd, Sanyo North America Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Energy Devices Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Toshiba Corporation, Michael Frank Bednarz and Christopher Andrews. Third brief on cross appeal due 07/06/2021 for Christopher Andrews, Michael Frank Bednarz and Steven Franklyn Helfand. Optional cross appeal Reply brief for Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs is due within 21 days of service of Third brief on cross appeal. [11991783] [21-15200, 21-15022, 21-15120, 21-15138] (RT) [Entered: 02/03/2021 03:32 PM] |
Filing 5 Terminated Robert Bernard Pringle for NEC Corporation in 21-15022 [11985157] (RR) [Entered: 01/28/2021 03:23 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Mr. Robert Bernard Pringle, Esquire for Appellee NEC Corporation. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 01/28/2021. [11984682] [21-15022] (Pringle, Robert) [Entered: 01/28/2021 12:29 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11974193] (CKP) [Entered: 01/21/2021 12:26 AM] |
Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [11961624] (RR) [Entered: 01/12/2021 10:17 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 02/05/2021. Transcript due 03/04/2021. Appellant Steven Franklyn Helfand opening brief due 04/15/2021. Appellees Hitachi Maxwell, Ltd., Hitachi, Ltd., Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, LG Chem America, Inc., LG Chem, Ltd., Maxwell Corporation of America, NEC Corporation, NEC Tokin Corporation, Panasonic Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co. Ltd., Sanyo Electric Co, Ltd, Sanyo North America Corporation, Sony Corporation, Sony Electronics, Inc., Sony Energy Devices Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc. and Toshiba Corporation answering brief due 05/17/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11955971] (RT) [Entered: 01/07/2021 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.