Lawrence Smith v. Xavier Becerra, et al
LAWRENCE CHRISTOPHER SMITH |
CHARLES R. BREHMER, Judicial Officer Superior Court of the County of Kern, XAVIER BECERRA, KEITH FAGUNDES, District Attorney of Kings County and LISA S. GREEN, District Attorney of Kern County |
21-15068 |
January 13, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Filed Appellant Lawrence Christopher Smith motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/22/2021. [12018550] (QDL) [Entered: 02/26/2021 03:42 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Lawrence Christopher Smith response to order to show cause dated 01/25/2021. Served on 02/22/2021. [12018547] (QDL) [Entered: 02/26/2021 03:41 PM] |
Filing 6 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response his letter of request filed on 02/11/2021. [12001816] (JR) [Entered: 02/12/2021 09:13 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Lawrence Christopher Smith letter dated 02/08/2021 re: Request for copy of rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12000905] (QDL) [Entered: 02/11/2021 02:07 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis status for this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11980254] (CKP) [Entered: 01/25/2021 02:14 PM] |
Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 01/22/2021 denying motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. [11977934] (QDL) [Entered: 01/22/2021 11:54 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11968354] (CKP) [Entered: 01/19/2021 03:21 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lawrence Christopher Smith opening brief due 03/12/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11961927] (JPD) [Entered: 01/13/2021 10:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.