David Evans v. D. Struve, et al
| DAVID EVANS |
| L. DINGFELDER, C. MCCARVEL, D. GONZALES, SIDEBOTHAM, S. RICHARDSON, D. STRUVE, VALICE and D. CALDERON |
| 21-15181 |
| February 2, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, SUSAN P. GRABER and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all of the claims or parties in action is not immediately appealable unless the district court directs entry of a judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12003863] (JPD) [Entered: 02/16/2021 10:51 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/03/2021, denying motion to appoint counsel. [11992443] (DL) [Entered: 02/04/2021 09:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David Evans opening brief due 04/02/2021. Appellees D. Struve, et al. answering brief due 05/03/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11989462] (JPD) [Entered: 02/02/2021 09:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
