Misty Harris v. Advanced Care Internal Med., et al
Defendant / Appellee: JANE DOE, named as: Jane Doe Wu - wife, ADVANCED CARE INTERNAL MEDICINE PLLC, an Arizona Professional Limited Liability Company and JIANWEN WU, Husband
Plaintiff / Appellant: MISTY HARRIS
Case Number: 21-15184
Filed: February 2, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 24, 2021 MISTY HARRIS V. ADVANCED CARE INTERNAL MED.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2021 Filing 11 Filed order (M. SMITH, BADE and BUMATAY) Appellees motion to dismiss (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ] ) is denied. Appellants opening brief is due April 19, 2021. Appellees answering brief is due May 19, 2021. Appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12029355] --[Edited: Updated docket text to reflect correct filing. 03/11/2021 by TYL] (JPD) [Entered: 03/09/2021 12:06 PM]
March 3, 2021 Filing 10 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 03/04/2021. See order for details. [12022637] (BLS) [Entered: 03/03/2021 10:14 AM]
February 11, 2021 Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 02/25/2021, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12001357] (BLS) [Entered: 02/11/2021 04:38 PM]
February 10, 2021 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellees Advanced Care Internal Medicine PLLC, Jane Doe and Jianwen Wu reply to response (motion to dismiss the case). Date of service: 02/10/2021. [11999004] [21-15184] (Schwartz, David) [Entered: 02/10/2021 10:35 AM]
February 8, 2021 Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/08/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11996055]. [21-15184] (AD) [Entered: 02/08/2021 12:44 PM]
February 8, 2021 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Misty Harris response to motion ([ # 4 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 4 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 02/08/2021. [11995495] [21-15184] (Bendau, Clifford) [Entered: 02/08/2021 09:31 AM]
February 8, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Misty Harris Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/08/2021. [11995476] [21-15184] (Bendau, Clifford) [Entered: 02/08/2021 09:25 AM]
February 4, 2021 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees Advanced Care Internal Medicine PLLC, Jane Doe and Jianwen Wu Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 02/04/2021. [11992511] [21-15184] (Schwartz, David) [Entered: 02/04/2021 09:58 AM]
February 4, 2021 Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) David Richard Schwartz for party(s) Appellee Advanced Care Internal Medicine PLLC Appellee Jane Doe Appellee Jianwen Wu, in case 21-15184. [11992307] (NAC) [Entered: 02/04/2021 08:53 AM]
February 4, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of David Richard Schwartz (Udall Shumway) for Appellees Advanced Care Internal Medicine PLLC, Jane Doe and Jianwen Wu. Date of service: 02/04/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11992294] [21-15184] (Schwartz, David) [Entered: 02/04/2021 08:48 AM]
February 2, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Misty Harris Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/09/2021. Appellant Misty Harris opening brief due 04/05/2021. Appellees Advanced Care Internal Medicine PLLC, Jane Doe and Jianwen Wu answering brief due 05/05/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11989600] (JBS) [Entered: 02/02/2021 10:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Misty Harris v. Advanced Care Internal Med., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JANE DOE, named as: Jane Doe Wu - wife
Represented By: David Richard Schwartz
Represented By: Bradley D. Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ADVANCED CARE INTERNAL MEDICINE PLLC, an Arizona Professional Limited Liability Company
Represented By: David Richard Schwartz
Represented By: Bradley D. Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JIANWEN WU, Husband
Represented By: David Richard Schwartz
Represented By: Bradley D. Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MISTY HARRIS
Represented By: Clifford Phillip Bendau II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?