Thomas Romano v. Internal Revenue Service Agent, et al
Defendant / Appellee: RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, California, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AGENTS, Unknown, RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS, Unknown and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AGENTS, Unknown
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS J. ROMANO
Case Number: 21-15217
Filed: February 5, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellees Richmond Police Department and Richmond Police Department Officers response to order to show cause dated 02/08/2021. Date of service: 02/26/2021. [12017846] [21-15217] (Wilson, Mark) [Entered: 02/26/2021 11:14 AM]
February 22, 2021 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Thomas J. Romano response to order to show cause. [12021374] (RR) [Entered: 03/02/2021 11:28 AM]
February 8, 2021 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district courts post-judgment order was entered on the docket on December 4, 2020. Appellants notice of appeal was filed in the district court on February 3, 2021. Accordingly, the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 60 days after entry of the district courts order. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11996034] (CKP) [Entered: 02/08/2021 12:35 PM]
February 5, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 03/05/2021. Transcript due 04/05/2021. Appellant Thomas J. Romano opening brief due 05/14/2021. Appellees Federal Bureau of Investigation Agents, Internal Revenue Service Agents, Richmond Police Department and Richmond Police Department Officers answering brief due 06/14/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11994847] (RT) [Entered: 02/05/2021 03:45 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Romano v. Internal Revenue Service Agent, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT, California
Represented By: Mark Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE AGENTS, Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHMOND POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICERS, Unknown
Represented By: Mark Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AGENTS, Unknown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: THOMAS J. ROMANO
Represented By: Thomas J. Romano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?